|
Download the call for papers in simple
text format (
9 KB) or PDF format (
115 KB).
Page contents
You are kindly invited to contribute
to the Fifth Workshop on User-Centred Design and Evaluation of Adaptive
Systems (UDEAS), which follows in the tracks of four very successful
workshops held in conjunction with UM2001, UM2003, AH2004 and UM2005.
The workshop's guiding perspective is that novel design approaches,
adequate evaluation methods, and reliable assessment criteria and
metrics are prerequisites for improving the quality and usability
of the next generations of adaptive systems. This workshop expands
upon the scope of its predecessors to explicitly focus on issues
related to the user-centred design of adaptive systems in general,
and the identification of usability engineering methods that can
be reused / modified to support design activities, and evaluate
concepts and prototypes in early phases of adaptation design. This
shift of focus is reflected both in the new title as well as and
in a new paper submission category as outlined below.
Workshop web site:
http://www.easy-hub.org/hub/workshops/ah2006/index.html
Web sites and proceedings of the four previous workshops:
http://www.easy-hub.org/hub/workshops.jsp
Thematic Areas
The workshop, continuing in the steps of its predecessors, will
focus on the following general themes:
- How can the development of adaptive systems be facilitated through
user involvement?
- Which usability engineering methods can be reused or need
to be adapted to inform different development stages of adaptive
systems?
- How can we ensure early user involvement in requirements
gathering and design activities?
- How can early prototypes of adaptive systems be user tested?
- How can potential trade-offs of adaptivity and usability
be resolved (e.g., consistency vs. context-sensitivity)?
- Which criteria and methods can be used to evaluate adaptivity?
- Which of the existing criteria and methods are appropriate
for the evaluation of user models and adaptive systems?
- What new criteria need to be introduced to specifically
cater for the presence of user modelling and adaptation in
the evaluated systems?
- What empirical methods are appropriate (or, how do existing
methods need to be modified, so as to be suitable) for assessment
against the new sets of criteria?
- How can user-centred design practices and evaluation studies
be encouraged?
- How can we encourage exploratory work in user involvement
in adaptation design?
- How can we foster an increase in the volume and quality
of empirical evaluations of adaptive systems?
- What are the most common pitfalls that can be identified
in previous studies
Workshop Format and Solicited Contributions
We plan to apply a format that facilitates goal-oriented group
discussions (among the workshop participants) in addition to the
standard paper presentations. The workshop will have two general
sessions (to be held in succession), as outlined below.
The first session will be organized around the general research
themes discussed earlier, i.e., submissions are to be evaluated
in regard to their relevance to / contribution towards the themes,
and the discussion during the workshop will be structured around
the themes. Participants of the workshop are expected to share their
experiences and discuss the issue of what constitutes good and bad
practice in studies targeting adaptive systems. Two types of submissions
will be solicited to achieve this goal: studies and position-papers.
Each study will be discussed in terms of experience gathered. The
submission of "unsuccessful studies" is explicitly encouraged,
as these can be very informative for other participants. Position-papers
will be solicited on all three of the workshop research themes.
Authors of such papers are expected to build upon related experience
to discuss and propose either new (or, reworked existing) metrics
/ approaches for user-centred design or evaluation of adaptation,
or, address the issue of why related studies in the literature are
so few and mostly uninformative. The topics to be raised by the
authors will be integrated in (and, hopefully, enrich) the aforementioned
study-based workshop discussions.
The second session will be devoted to the “planned work”
category of papers. The format envisaged for this session involves
rather short presentations of plans (or problems encountered in
devising adequate plans) for user involvement in the design activities
of, or for the evaluation of, adaptive systems. The presentations
will serve as a starting point for discussions among the workshop’s
participants. Depending on the number of submissions in this category,
we will consider: (a) the assembly of a panel of experts to facilitate
and guide the discussions, and (b) the division of workshop participants
into groups, each of which addresses a smaller number of plans in
detail, and reports results (e.g., identified issues, suggestions
/ solutions for overcoming those, etc.) back to the workshop’s
closing plenary session.
The workshop will also include an invited talk on the topic of
common pitfalls and problems when using "traditional"
approaches to design and evaluate adaptive systems. This talk is
intended as a condensed overview of existing knowledge in the field,
as well as the results of previous workshops. It will serve both
as a mini "tutorial" on the subject and as a basis for
further discussion among participants, and a stepping stone for
the definition of future work in the field.
Submission Format
Submissions should not exceed 10 pages for studies / position
papers and 4 pages for "planned work" papers, and should
be formatted according to the Springer LNCS guidelines. Please refer
to the submission section of the workshop's web site for more information
on the submission format.
Workshop papers will be published in full length in the workshop
proceedings and presented in talks at the workshop.
Please, submit your paper on-line at the workshop's conference
management site (refer to the "Submission" section of
the workshop’s site for details). If you encounter problems
in using the site's tools, you can also submit the paper by e-mail
to ah2006-workshop@easy-hub.org until Monday, March 31st, 2006.
Portable Document Format (*.pdf) and Postscript (*.ps) files are
preferred.
Important Dates
| March 31st, 2006: |
Submission of papers (studies, position papers
and "planned work") |
| April 28th, 2006: |
Notification of authors |
| May 26th, 2006: |
Delivery of camera-ready copy |
| June 20th, 2006: |
Workshop day; the conference lasts from the June
20th to the 23rd 2006 |
Programme Committee
- David Chin, University of Hawaii at Manoa, USA
- Betsy van Dijk, Twente University, The Netherlands
- Christina Gena, University of Turin, Italy
- Anthony Jameson, DFKI, Germany
- Judith Masthoff, University of Aberdeen, UK
- Alexandros Paramythis, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria
- Gerhard Weber, University of Education Freiburg, Germany
- Stephan Weibelzahl, National College of Ireland, Ireland
- Frank Wittig, SAP, Germany
Organizers
Dr.Stephan Weibelzahl
National College of Ireland Dublin
Mayor Street IFSC
Dublin 1
Ireland
+353 1 4498 579
sweibelzahl at ncirl.ie
http://www.weibelzahl.de/
Alexandros Paramythis
Institute for Information Processing and Microprocessor Technology
(FIM)
Johannes Kepler University Linz
Altenbergerstr. 69
A-4040 Linz, AUSTRIA
+43 732 2468 8442
alpar at fim.uni-linz.ac.at
http://www.fim.uni-linz.ac.at/staff/paramythis/
Dr.Judith Masthoff
Department of Computing Science
University of Aberdeen
Aberdeen AB24 3UE
Scotland, UK
+44 1224 272299
jmasthoff at csd.abdn.ac.uk
http://www.csd.abdn.ac.uk/~jmasthof/
|